05-23-2012, 11:52 AM
You know, everyone's all "perma death is much more dramatic and has a much more profound impact on characters" is leaving me to wonder if I'm one of the only guys who considers the dramatic potential of resurrections.
When Urameil died, Aryeon was upset as all hell. When he resurrected him, he was still upset, because even though he brought the bastard back from the veil, there's still the fact he -could- have lost him forever. It's like a scar, it's a reminder that he screwed up and it could happen again. When people stay dead, you eventually cope and move on, but when they come back, it brings up all sorts of other issues. Did the victim learn from their mistake? What of their loved ones? Will they clamor and suffocate him to make sure he lives? There's no real coping and moving on, because the issue is still alive (pardon the pun).
But that's just me.
When Urameil died, Aryeon was upset as all hell. When he resurrected him, he was still upset, because even though he brought the bastard back from the veil, there's still the fact he -could- have lost him forever. It's like a scar, it's a reminder that he screwed up and it could happen again. When people stay dead, you eventually cope and move on, but when they come back, it brings up all sorts of other issues. Did the victim learn from their mistake? What of their loved ones? Will they clamor and suffocate him to make sure he lives? There's no real coping and moving on, because the issue is still alive (pardon the pun).
But that's just me.
Your stories will always remain...
![[Image: nIapRMV.png?1]](http://i.imgur.com/nIapRMV.png?1)
... as will your valiant hearts.